Skip to content

The Rabbit Hole

  • Home
  • About..
    • Mispy Haven
  • Modus Mutuus
  • Liberatio Mystica

Tag: ideology

Kill the cop that sleeps inside you

Posted on December 13, 2025 - December 13, 2025 by rabbitrunriot

In order to fight authoritarianism, you must become a beacon of its antithesis: liberty. Securing personal freedom and autonomy only makes you a liberated person. To be a liberation advocate, you must actively fight to secure the liberty of others. The most difficult part of this process, which most people will not ever get past (especially since we want people to trust our vision as a form of self-validation), is killing their inner cop.

“Fuck you, I’m not a cop!”

No, that’s not what I mean. Chill out for a minute and let me explain…

Liberation is not just about securing more liberty for yourself and compatriots; it is also about reducing the proliferation of authoritarianism in whatever way we are able. When we claim liberty for ourselves, it becomes an ethical duty to secure and preserve it for others. We tend to focus this fight outward, in our opposition to oppressive social institutions. For all the good this does, though, we tend to ignore the (critical) inner dimensions of our ego and identity.

No matter how much we believe in and prize freedom and egalitarianism, our ego has an innate drive to enforce itself and it’s identity on the world around us due to conditioning of the environment (western liberalism) in which it has developed. In other words, the world that shaped us has taught us that self-actualization comes through objectively imprinting your “mark” on the world — domination, expansionism, imperialism — whether this is as a militant colonizer nation or a cutthroat Wall Street shark makes no difference. This is the life we’re supposed to want in the modern neoliberal west.

The ego’s strong attachment to our identity in the world means that any perceived attack on that identity — our emotions, ideas, and opinions, or our reason, logic, and wisdom; that is, our subjective and objective conception of the world — is taken as a personal attack. The perception of an attack then results in the conception of a conflict and the ego seeks to assert itself and its truth. The act of enforcing its opinion and ideas on the outside world without giving the options for “compromise,” “opting out,” or “agreeing to disagree,” becomes a de facto authoritarian dynamic… your inner cop has come out to assert how big he is.

This builds society in an intrinsically hierarchic way. Where your ego triumphs, you are “above” those people; where it submits, you are “below.” When everyone in a community is stuck in this arrogant and self-righteous cycle of trying to assert themselves as individuals, the community cannot help but tend towards vertical organization. This means that those “below” are naturally positioned to oppose those “above,” and society becomes conflict-oriented and authoritarian organically.

It is, therefore, imperative that we learn to recognize authoritarian tendencies in ourselves, and have the objectivity and humility to call ourselves out. We are responsible, first and foremost, for ourselves. If we cannot embody the behaviors of a liberator, nobody has any reason to believe liberation is possible.

And, crucially, this is not a one-time process. It’s something we must be actively engaging in — every moment of every day. Be mindful of your actions and thoughts — police them yourself (so other people don’t have to, and so you don’t get tempted to police other people). Cultivate humility. Learn to be accepting of failure and faults, and seek compromise and cooperation — always — instead of conflict, schism, and war.

Posted in Anarchy, Ethics, PhilosophyTagged anarchy, authoritarianism, ideology, inner cop, liberation, paradigms, perspective, philosophy, self-honesty

Ideological pluralism in an anarchist society

Posted on December 2, 2025 - December 2, 2025 by rabbitrunriot

A discussion on Reddit (where you’ll find most of the below as a comment) prompted me to consider the divide between social and individual anarchism, and why both sides seem to think their ideology needs to be universalized in order for an anarchist society to be sustainable — in other words, “the revolution” should result in global anarcho-communism, or should result in global left-market anarchism, or whatever. This is absurd. And kind of antithetic to anarchism. And we’re going to find out why.

I’m going to use the two biggest “classes” of anarchist philosophy — Social Anarchism and Individualist Anarchism for this discussion, but you can find fractally-embedded microcosms of this conflict within each, and within each of their subclasses; the social-versus-individualist dichotomy has been a dividing force in anarchism since its early days. I have started to find it exhausting because it’s not only unnecessary, but irrelevant and even detrimental. Let me explain.

The real discrepancy is in the perception of anarchy. If you prioritize the individual’s subjective perception of their freedom (usually measured by negative liberty, expressed in values such as voluntary association, the no-harm principle, etc.), this becomes individualist anarchism. On the other hand, if priority is given to the objective egalitarianism of society (measured by positive liberty, expressed in values such as communalism, entitlement to equal opportunities, “from each according to ability to each according to need,” etc.), the anarchist ideal takes on a decided social disposition.

Regardless of what your predilection is, all anarchists can agree on a few basic principles. Among these, deprivatization and voluntaryism are generally non-negotiable.

When private industry (which includes the State) is eliminated and social participation becomes voluntary, it becomes impossible to establish a community that is larger than its locality. Towns and communities become the largest social organizations and they can federate and ally with each other but that doesn’t give one member of the federation the right to dictate how the others organize (lest we violate the principle of voluntaryism). So, from this, a certain guarantee of plurality arises: not all towns and communities need to follow the same organizational structure for managing their resources. How an individual community organizes itself is mostly irrelevant to the other communities it is cooperative with, and those interactions, themselves, will evolve their own dynamic.

In other words, even within a regional federation, there is nothing preventing each community from employing the ideology it is most drawn to. There can be communes, mutualist markets, syndicalism, and whatever else within that federation. Further appealing to the principle of voluntaryism, any individual in any of these communities is free to leave and go to any other community (or none at all for you primitivists and survivalists) at any time, based on what suits them.

There will never be a socio-political solution to the social-individual dichotomy because the one that suits each individual best is subjective to the individual’s social value orientation. Whether an individual prioritizes positive or negative liberty more highly will determine their disposition.

We’re really just spinning our wheels with this argument, and holding back progress. This is all stuff that can be worked out locally; it need not factor into our larger, shared fight against capitalism and the state. Of course the capitalists and statists and fascists and vanguardists love this because, as long as we’re too busy fighting each other, we’re not strong enough to fight them… so they throw gasoline on this fire and we do the work of suppressing our movement for them.

Posted in Mutualism, RamblingsTagged anarchy, ideology, philosophy, pluralism, subjective vs objective

Recent Posts

  • Virtue, Vehicle, and Status Quo
  • Kill the cop that sleeps inside you
  • Domestication and Schism
  • Transcending Anarchism?
  • Ethics in AI Proliferation

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025

Categories

  • Anarchy
  • Ethics
  • Mutualism
  • Philosophy
  • Psyche
  • Ramblings
  • Technology
  • Uncategorized

Links

  • Sherwood Forest Collective
  • Industrial Workers of the World (IWW)
  • ICL-CIT
  • RiseUp.net
  • May First Technology
  • AnarchistNews
  • Anarchy Planet
  • Newlane University
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: micro, developed by DevriX.